Columns                   Blog       













Home

© All columns copyrighted

Columns must not be reprinted in any form without the author's express permission.

An Atom/RSS-compatible feed for your news reader is available here


 

Melvin's blog

Nshima & Curry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Melvin's  Blog

Nshima & Curry

 

 

DYING TO WATCH AN INDIAN SHOW

I had never heard of the hit British comedy series "The
Kumars at No 42," but according to a BBC article, it
features an Indian family. That itself is enough to excite
me, for I hardly ever get to see Indians on American
television, except when CNN shows them rioting.

Sure, a few Indian actors have recently appeared on
prime-time shows, but that hardly compensates for all those
years of neglect, when deprived Indians had to resort to
watching "The Simpsons" and praying for an appearance by
Apu. (The "Apu takes a bride" episode still stands as the
greatest Indian moment on American TV. In second place: "Apu
almost gets deported," an episode that inspired thousands of
Indian-Americans to become immigration lawyers.)

Wouldn't it be great to watch a show that revolves around
Indian characters, focusing on their everyday lives, not
just their weddings and immigration woes?
After all, Indian-Americans, one of the fastest growing
ethnic groups, are almost two million strong -- and not all
of them spend their nights watching Bollywood movies. (Some
spend their days.)

But the TV networks have not only overlooked the Indian
market, they've given little representation to Asians as a
whole. Rather than putting one Asian show on prime-time TV,
CBS prefers two versions of the news magazine "60 Minutes,"
NBC prefers three versions of the drama "Law & Order," and
ABC prefers four versions of the ongoing mystery "Where's
Osama hiding today?"

Meanwhile, "The Kumars at No 42," starring Sanjeev Bhaskar,
is a cult success in Britain, the BBC article says. Bhaskar
acts as a talk show host whose studio is attached to his
family's house, allowing his parents and grandmother to
interrogate his guests, mostly real-life British celebrities
whom Americans have never heard of.

As I read the article on "The Kumars," I am surprised to
learn that NBC has purchased the U.S. screen rights to the
show's idea, outbidding Fox. At first, I can't believe my
eyes. Surely there must be a misprint. Surely NBC isn't
interested in a show that features Indians, especially since
the Indians spend most of their time talking, not doing
something immoral or illegal. How in heaven's name does NBC
expect to attract younger viewers?

But it's true: NBC has bought the rights to the show and
doesn't plan to turn the Kumars into a group of oversexed
villains. Instead -- and here's the part that infuriates
me -- NBC plans to turn them into Mexican-Americans. Yes,
the U.S. version of "The Kumars" may be known as "The
Kumaros."

You want to know what I think of NBC's idea? I think it
stinks. I have nothing against Mexican-Americans, but if the
show works in Britain with Indians, why not try it in
America with Indians, too? Why deprive Vijay Amritraj of
another acting opportunity?

Granted, Mexican-Americans outnumber Indian-Americans, but
who says ALL Americans wouldn't be interested in watching a
show that features Indians? After all, "Seinfeld," my
favorite sitcom, attracted a diverse audience, not just
Jewish-Americans. And "Roseanne," another successful comedy,
appealed to almost everyone, not just fat people.

Whenever the U.S. version of "The Kumars" is televised --
perhaps in a year or two -- I can guarantee you one thing: I
won't be watching.

Hey, someone has to protest.

Send this column to a friend

                                                        

                                             Don't forget to visit Melvin's funny blog!

                                                         Email address: