|
|
| RELIGIOUS INDIA DEFEATS SECULAR INDIA A friend recently reminded me that India is a secular state, prompting me to burst out laughing. It was the funniest thing I had heard since someone used the words "honest" and "politician" in the same sentence. If India can accurately be described as "secular," then Mike Tyson is well within his rights to call himself "stable." To be sure, a young India groomed itself as a secular state, one that would not favor a particular religion over another. But the India of 1950 is not the same as the India of 2002, Dev Anand's hairstyle notwithstanding. It's a good thing Mahatma Gandhi isn't alive today to see the religious hatred that the political leaders of "secular India" have wrought. If he were to meet Narendra Modi, the Gujarat chief minister who did little to prevent the recent massacre of Muslims, Gandhi would be tempted to set aside nonviolence for a few minutes to give Modi a good beating. Western reporter: "Mr. Gandhi, you believe in nonviolence, don't you? Then why did you strike Mr. Modi?" Gandhi: "Mr. Modi turned a blind eye on the slaughter of Muslims. I merely spent a few minutes turning his blind eye into a black eye. Perhaps he can see better now." Reporter: "But Mr. Gandhi, didn't you once say that an eye for an eye would make the whole world blind?" Gandhi: "Yes, but I was speaking in general terms. Man cannot live without exceptions." My dictionary defines secular as "not specifically relating to religion or to a religious body." But even this definition is open to interpretation. It can be argued, for example, that the BCCI, India's cricket board, is "secular," despite the fact that millions of people follow cricket religiously. Not to mention that so many of them worship Sachin Tendulkar. But it's harder to argue that the nation is secular, not when politics and religion are so intertwined, when the ruling BJP is described as a "Hindu nationalist" party, when the government supports militant religious groups that turn one Indian against another. Under these circumstances, expecting India to be secular is like expecting Bill Clinton to be celibate. It's virtually impossible. We Indians are fond of describing our motherland as the "world's largest democracy," a title that has been earned partly through the efforts of ordinary people, who routinely face two major challenges: (1) deciding which political candidate to vote for: the corrupt one or the crazy one; and (2) figuring out how to avoid the social worker from the family planning office. We are also fond of describing India as "secular," going so far as to compare it to America, a country where the killer of a Hindu is prosecuted as aggressively as the killer of a Christian, where the police are required to give equal protection to ordinary citizens, whether they worship Jesus, Allah, Shiva or Tendulkar. If that reminds you of India, perhaps you need a few more visits to your psychiatrist. When western reporters use the term "Hindu India" or "Hindu-dominated India," some Indians are quick to criticize them: "India is a secular country, you morons. It is not like Saudi Arabia, Iran, or, god-forbid, Pakistan." Call me crazy, but I'd rather have a "Hindu India" that values EVERY life than a "secular India" that turns its back on religious minorities. Send this column to a friend |
|
Don't forget to visit Melvin's funny blog! |
